hairylunch (hairylunch) wrote,
hairylunch
hairylunch

March Madness

So my friend Dan (I'd link to his xanga, but he got a new one and didn't tell me what it was) and I have made a series of bets for our respective alma matris (I don't remember my high school latin well enough to remember if that's the correct plural of mater or not) and their performance in the tournament. The bet is structured by rounds as follows:

  • Round of 32: Cheeseburger

  • Sweet Sixteen: Fast Food Combo Meal

  • Elite Eight: Ruby Tuesday or similar venue for a dollar value less than 800 American pennies

  • Final Four: Ryan's buffet or similar

  • Finals: Chess set (whomever is buying the set gets to keep the set, the penalty is they have to buy the set)

  • Champion: Cold hard cash - $20



Oh, for those who are curious, here's my alma mater and here's Dan's. The bet is interesting in that if both our teams go out in the same round, neither party is a loser. On the other hand, most of the "experts are predicting that UC loses early on, while some have GaTech making it to the final four, at which point I'd be out significantly. I'm hoping that this is the year that UC regains it's former tournament glory, maybe like the 91-92 team. Not likely, but I can hope :D
Subscribe

  • new digs

    I've moved to https://ernieseruditions.wordpress.com/! I've been on LiveJournal since the navel-gazing days of blogging, even paying for a…

  • Portland and Protests

    Truth is complicated. Memes and tweets serve as news for many today, and folks cherry pick their sources and the items they want to believe.…

  • Random Thoughts

    Lots of time to listen to podcasts and think/process these days . . . a few items that have been percolating in my brain ... Being a poet/imposter…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 1 comment