hairylunch (hairylunch) wrote,
hairylunch
hairylunch

Interesting court decision

I wrote about the Day of Truth a little over a year ago. I didn't realize that there had been a lawsuit over the students (or probably their parents) who thought that in protest to the Day of Silence that they would wear shirts that said "Be ashamed - our school has embraced what God has condemned."

As stated previously, I didn't think the student should be suspended, and that his speech should be protected under the First Amendment. Apparently the courts disagree with me:
In a 2-1 decision, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals said that a T-shirt that proclaimed "Be ashamed, our school embraced what God has condemned" on the front and "Homosexuality is shameful" on the back was "injurious to gay and lesbian students and interfered with their right to learn." Wearing such a T-shirt can be barred on a public high school campus without violating the 1st Amendment, the court said.
This ruling is similar to Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeir in that it limits the First Amendment rights of secondary school students.

This isn't as far reaching as Hazelwood in that it's only a Circuit Court. I'm torn because I understand the courts rationale that the shirt was "injurious to gay and lesbian students and interfered with their right to learn." In fact, when I was in high school, there were students who wore "I hate preps" shirts, and were asked to remove them. Even then I thought this was silly, though the shirts did almost lead to a fight between one of the guys wearing the shirt (arguably a "scrub") and one of the "preps/jocks," which was clearly disrupting the learning environment. And while I don't condone messages of hate, "In numerous instances, the U.S. Supreme Court has held that Americans must tolerate offensive speech, including permitting marches by Nazis through a community with a substantial Jewish population."

The crux of the decision seems to be that creating a safe learning environment is more important than the First Amendment (with regards to teenagers). I guess overall, I support the decision as it gives school administrators some latitude in creating the best environment for students to learn in, but the libertarian in me is offended to see the erosion of rights. This seems particularly important considering most students don't even know their First Amendment rights . . .
Tags: court, first ammendment, free speech, high school
Subscribe

  • new digs

    I've moved to https://ernieseruditions.wordpress.com/! I've been on LiveJournal since the navel-gazing days of blogging, even paying for a…

  • Portland and Protests

    Truth is complicated. Memes and tweets serve as news for many today, and folks cherry pick their sources and the items they want to believe.…

  • Random Thoughts

    Lots of time to listen to podcasts and think/process these days . . . a few items that have been percolating in my brain ... Being a poet/imposter…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments